Longo O., & Sigurtà D. (eds.) (2019).
Trent: LISt Lab. ISBN 9788832080186
Abstract:
This book, for editorial reasons, contains only an excerpt of a larger research conducted by the editors of this volume on the issue of place-making, both in urban and naturalistic areas, through the study and design of micro-architectures. Throughout history, small-scale architectures have been a widespread manifestation of human beings faced with the need to root themselves in a particular place. Shelters, small services, landscape viewpoints, etc., have been shaped by an infinity of materials that have determined, depending on the techniques used and cultural contexts, different forms of response to the same need. In recent years, we can identify several examples of architecture, small and medium-sized, designed and referred to as "kiosks" or "pavilions" or "street furniture." Looking at the many examples, designed or built, we can extract the key words that are inspiring our research: decoration, entertainment, promotion, culture, art, functionality. Terms that can orient these microarchitectures for both naturalistic settings and urban situations that require increasingly urgent interventions, such as accessibility and disability. When we speak of microarchitectures, the relationship with the landscape becomes symbiotic both in relational terms with existing forms, whether of modernity or the past, and in experiential terms with material culture in its historical stratification. From this holistic perspective, architecture must assume the responsibilities of mediating between the new conformation of the landscape and its historical tradition, in the knowledge that it will inevitably end up changing both their internal relationships and those with the work itself. The new way of doing architecture must know how to read the landscape in which it is inserted, whether man-made or natural, and must take charge of its survival precisely in order to keep alive that "material culture" from which it was born. Architecture that does not know how to do this is bound to be experienced as a 'foreign body' and in so doing risks being forgotten or perceived as something whose preservation is not in the priorities of the anthropological context of which it is the child. The correct reading of the stratification of meanings present in a place, moreover, can give additional value to microarchitecture because it can be an opportunity to recover the human-landscape relationship in those contexts where this bond has been lost.